It has been recently published that if Israel is attacked, USA will defend Israel. Obviously in reference to the nuclear menace of Iran. It is well known the interest of George E. Bush in defending Israel, but there’s another spiritual reason less known. I’m talking of millenium. The Bible talks about 1000 years of “peace” or unactivity of the devil (Revelation 20:1 – 3). It’s teached by most of protestants that these “millenium” preceeds the second coming of Christ. So it is tryed to involve the secular powers to impose the “millenium of peace” in this world. This must include the restoration of Israel and his temple. Here we go! That’s the non political reason for Mr. Bush to act so! I affirm he is convinced that he’s divinely appointed to instaure the peace of the world and the inauguration of the millenium. What’s wrong with all this? The key for this is the resurrection of the righteous. Jesus said that there are two resurrections (John 5:29): “And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation”. Accordin to Paul (1 Corinthians 15:23) at the moment of the second coming of Jesus, the death in Christ will be resurrected. And if we keep reading in Revelation 20:4 and forward, we’ll se that the righteous resurrected are reigning WITH Jesus 1000 years, and in verse 5 says “But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection”. So in this first resurrection, at the beggining of the millenium are resurrected only the righteous, but not the rest of dead. In summary, the Bible teaches that the millenium begins with the second coming of Jesus, not preceeds it. Now let’s think how important is to understand correctly the Bible, even can provoke wars in the name of Jesus (modern and hidden crusades in Palestine, Irak, Iran…?). Irak has petroleum, but not Israel or Palestine or Iran…
31, Mayo, 2006
USA DEFENDS ISRAEL
WHAT REALLY EXTINGUISHED DINOSAURS
Well, the magazine Science, and some mass media, are publicating the discovery of the planning ahead of some apes. But as it can be read in the article, the basis for the developing thought is that planning ahead is a only-human characteristic. The argument is that some chimps can bring a tool to somewhere else to solve a problem, or even keep it for a time waiting for the problem to appear. It’s argued again that SOME scientifics define the future planning is a beyond animal capability. Well, my questions are: How long took this investigation? Did the apes learn a pattern of behaviour? What about the using of tools by bultures to open eggs and breaking bones? How about hunting in groups by other species? Is not that future planning also? I mean, we’ve more in common with other species and families than is thought. Are these “discoveries” monstrating that the apes are still evoluioning?
APES PLANNING AHEAD
Well, the magazine Science, and some mass media, are publicating the discovery of the planning ahead of some apes. But as it can be read in the article, the basis for the developing thought is that planning ahead is a only-human characteristic. The argument is that some chimps can bring a tool to somewhere else to solve a problem, or even keep it for a time waiting for the problem to appear. It’s argued again that SOME scientifics define the future planning is a beyond animal capability. Well, my questions are: How long took this investigation? Did the apes learn a pattern of behaviour? What about the using of tools by bultures to open eggs and breaking bones? How about hunting in groups by other species? Is not that future planning also? I mean, we’ve more in common with other species and families than is thought. Are these “discoveries” monstrating that the apes are still evoluioning?
VARSOVIA
I have the blog in stand by since one week ago waiting for interesting news, and today we’ve one! USA (Mr. Bush) wants to install an anti-nuclear missiles shield in Europe. It’s okay to deffend oneself, but I’ve a few questions. What if these missiles are destroyed in european sky? Will we have more toxic or radiactive clouds or rain (like Chernobyl ones)? The countries that offer themselves to install the shield, will become in targets of the enemies of others? It is easy to use the far neighbour as an antibullet jacket. The truth is that we see the supremacy of USA in the world, as it was previewed thousands of years ago in Bible symbols. “When ye see this things, rise up your face, because your salvation is at hand”.
IMMIGRATION: GUILTY OR GUILTY?
In these days, Spanish shores are an enormeous and coveted destination. Every day are arriving hundreds of african immigrants pursuing a dream. Now we complain to the Spanish government to take measures of prevention. Which measures? Repatriation? Too expensive, and very often, burocraticaly impossible. We don’t want immigrants, they disturb us, they are a problem. Let’s think, who’s the guilty (responsible) one of all this? The same immigrants? Ourselves beeing inhuman for don’t wanting them among us? Isn’t it fair to search for a better life? SOLUTION: Is not to make massive deportations. It isn’t matter of build higher fences on the borders, like Mr. Bush is doing nowdays along the mexican border, sending there 6,000 soldiers to do it. Let’s ask ourselves, why are these people coming to our country (any country)? Perhaps would be a good idea to invest in the immigrants’ countries of origin, in place of investing in uncrossable borders. If the money destined to protect our borders, could be destined to development in those countries, perhaps we could find a better world in a few years… But no, we still prefer being “safe” and comfortable in our occidental bubble. I don’t beg us to dispense of what we have, but to invest resources in other things thar aren’t weapons, for example. Or stop destroying tons of food to keep the market prices up, and try to send them anywhere that need them… Who’s the guilty? The incoming one? Or the one who provokes them to come?
CHRISTIAN RADIO MARTYRS
This “New” has no comment. The News Agency Europa Press in Nairobi, Kenya, has communicated that a Pentecostal Radio Station has been assaulted. In this assault, one person was murdered, and part of the radio installations were burned up. Why? Just in that moment they were comparing several texts between the Coran and the Bible. Radio stations have much more power to preach the gospel than we think…
WARNING! PROSELITISM!
These days, Dalai Lama is on tour through south america. The message he’s bearing is simple, easy and comfortable: “Do not change your religion”. The important is to practice religion, says Dalai Lama. Also argues that there’s no reason for divisions an fanaticism. At the same time, the World Council of Churches (WCC) pursues to elaborate a “behaviour code” on religious conversions. Who’s gona take the “honour”? In midst of all this mess of news, some words from the Bible are rushing into my mind: “For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect” (Matthew 24:24). From other side, apostle Paul advises us that there is “one body, one Spirit… one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God an Father of all” (Ephesians 4:4-6) Is it a Paul’s caprice? Was Paul wrong in being “proselitist” among gentiles? Why Revelation insists in describing the people of God as those who keep His commandaments (Revelation 12:17; 14:12; 22:14)? Maybe we’ll try to make God rectify and publish a misprint index of the Bible…
EXTINGUISHED MAMOTHS
t’s always interesting to see science corroborating what we already knew thanks to the Bible. It’s recently published that the mamoths didn’t extinguished because of massive hunting, as it was thought, but for an important climatic shift. Rare? Absolutely no. Why that intense intention of discarding sistematically what the Bible says, or what you can deduce from it? The Universal Flood has the keys to explain reasonably (but its own origin) why do we find the continents in this actual distribution, fossils, the dessaparition of the big species, etc. After the universal flood, as a consequence of the water weight on the earth cortex,doubtlessly had to emerge a “volcanic era” (we understand very short), because of the breaking of the earth cortex, forming the actual continents, in a very short and fast time. That intense magmatic activity had to eject huge amounts of ashes and smoke to the atmosphere, what provoked the begining of a glaciar age inmediately after the volcanoes one, all just after the flood. It isn’t so bizarre, nowdays the men of science are trying to blend both theories, the volcanic era and the meteorite dissaster, driving to the ice age. The courious matter is that this pattern is so close to the one defended by creationists, but with a meteor in place of a flood. The Bible says that in Jerusalem, even far south from it, snowed by the end of the 2nd millenium before Christ (see 2 Samuel 23:20; Proverbs 31:21) and nowdays those regions are considered as semi-dessertics. Ice age is not that far away as commonly thought. And now it seems that polar glaciars are going backwards, but it has been like this since thousands of years ago, but now we can mesure it… Coming back to mamoths, as lots of other species, died in the flood , or in the following glacial age, as pints the Bible. It’s obvious that died in a very brutal climatic shift… and we realize now! But this is not the first time, the Bible has been telling us for over 2.800 years that the earth is spheric shaped (see Isaiah 40:22), but it wasn’t until Colombus demonstrate “empirically” that this truth was commonly accepted. Before 1492, anybody who dared to say, teach or belive that the earth wasn’t flate, was fuel for the flames (or almost). Anyway, it’s so much more to say about, I want to reffer that apostle Peter anounced almost 2000 years ago that the flood would be ignored volunteerly in the end times, to mock christians an belivers in tne name of “science”. For more details, read 2 Peter 3:3-10.
USA DEFIENDE ISRAEL
Se acaba de publicar que si Israel es atacado, Estados Unidos defenderá a Israel. Obviamente, esto hace referencia a la amenaza nuclear de Irán. Es de sobras conocido el interés de George E. Bush al defender Israel, pero hay otro interés espiritual menos conocido. Estoy hablando del “milenio”.
La Biblia habla de 1000 años de “paz” o de inactividad del diablo (Apocalipsis 20:1 – 3). Se enseña por parte de la mayoría de protestantes que ese “milenio” precede a la segunda venida de Cristo. Así que se intenta involucrar los poderes seculares para imponer el “milenio de paz” en este mundo. Esto debe incluir la restauración de Israel y su Templo. ¡Y ahí vamos! Esa es la razón no política del Sr. Bush para actuar así. Afirmo que está convencido de que se cree divinamente escogido para instaurar la paz en el mundo y la inauguración del milenio. ¿Dónde está el error en todo esto?
La clave para esto está en la resurrección de los justos. Jesús afirmó que hay dos resurrecciones (Juan 5:29): “Y los que hicieron lo bueno, saldrán a resurrección de vida; mas los que hicieron lo malo, a resurrección de condenación”. De acuerdo con Pablo en 1 Corintios 15:23, en el momento de la segunda venida de Jesús, los muertos en Cristo serán resucitados. Y si seguimos leyendo en Apocalipsis 20:4 en adelante, vemos que los justos resucitados están reinando CON Jesús esos 1000 años, y en el versículo 5 diice “pero los otros muertos no vivieron otra vez hasta que pasaron los 1000 años. Esta es la primera resurrección”. Así que en esta primera resurrección, al PRINCIPIO del milenio sólo resucitan los justos pero no el resto de los muertos.
En resumen, la Biblia enseña que el milenio comienza con la Segunda Venida de Cristo, y no la precede. Pensemos ahora en lo importante que es comprender correctamente la Biblia, incluso puede provocar guerras en el nombre de Jesús (¿modernas y ocultas cruzadas en Palestina, Irak, Irán…?) Irak tiene petróleo, pero no lo hay en Israel o Palestina o Irán…
LO QUE REALMENTE EXTINGUIÓ A LOS DINOSAURIOS
Me he tropezado con un artÍculo en la revista MuyInteresante.es, que habla de la extinción de los dinosaurios. Hace dos años escuché un programa de radio donde pro primera vez oí a un científico hablando de una teoría mixta, que implicaba tanto a un meteorito como a una “era” volcánica.
El primero provocó la segunda, lo que “realmente” mató a los dinosaurios (de acuerdo a su teoría). Ahora encontramos un artículo que nos dice lo mismo. Tal y como dije en el otro artículo “Mamuts Extinguidos“, algo enorme tuvo que romper la corteza terrestre para provocar un evento volcánico. Un meteorito es bastante grande, pero para romper la corteza de la tierra en cualquier otra parte de la esfera…. Tuvo que ser algo mucho más grande y más pesado. Después de todo, ¿cómo es que podemos encontrar fósiles acuáticos en la cima de una montaña si estamos hablando de actividad volcánica? ¿No fluye el magma hacia abajo?
Sigo pensando que lo que cuenta la Biblia es más razonable, para el actual estado de evidencias. Un tremendo diluvio pudo provocar ambas cosas, la actividad volcánica generalizada, y la consiguiente glaciación, y por lo tanto, la extinción de los dinosaurios (y otros animales). Lo único que me llama la atención es llamar al artículo, “lo que REALMENTE mató a los dinosaurios”, y que luego hablen de “UNA TEORÍA”…
